From Retail Founder to Tech Founder: What Changed and What Didn’t

People often talk about becoming a tech founder as if it requires becoming a different person.

Different mindset. Different pace. Different rules.

After building in retail and now building in tech, I see it differently.

Some things changed. Many things did not.

What changed was the surface area of decisions. Technology amplifies both speed and consequence. The feedback loops are faster. The margins for error are smaller. The visibility is higher, even when clarity is not.

What did not change was the core work of being a founder.

I still spend most of my time making decisions with incomplete information. I still navigate tension between vision and execution. I still manage energy, relationships, and trust as carefully as I manage strategy.

What surprised me most was how transferable experience actually is.

Retail taught me how to read customers in real time. How to operate when systems break. How to lead teams through pressure without hiding behind abstraction. Those skills matter just as much in tech, even if they are less celebrated.

What tech has demanded of me is sharper boundaries. Clearer communication. More intentional decision making. There is less room to absorb imbalance quietly. Problems scale faster here.

That has required me to become more deliberate about how I lead, who I listen to, and how I define success.

I no longer confuse momentum with progress. I no longer assume that endurance is the same as alignment. And I no longer believe that building alone is a mark of strength.

This transition did not make me a new founder. It clarified the kind of founder I want to be.

Going forward, this space will continue to document that journey. The questions I am asking. The decisions I am making. The lessons that carry across industries, and the ones that do not.

Founders evolve. Experience compounds. And leadership, at every stage, is still about making thoughtful choices under pressure.

That part has not changed at all. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I Found a Mentor Before I Burned Everything Down

There is a point in a founder’s journey where momentum becomes a liability. You keep moving because that is what founders do. You solve problems. You absorb pressure. You make it work. From the outside, it can look like resilience. From the inside, it can feel like erosion. I reached that point during a period of significant transition. I was navigating the sale of one business while simultaneously laying the groundwork for another. At the same time, I was dealing with increasing strain inside a founding relationship that no longer felt balanced or sustainable. Nothing was exploding. That was part of the problem. When situations are clearly broken, decisions are easier. When they are quietly misaligned, founders tend to normalize the discomfort. You tell yourself it is temporary. That it will settle. That pushing harder is the responsible thing to do. What changed everything for me was finding the right mentor. I did not need motivation or tactics. I needed perspective. I needed someon...
Read more

What No One Tells You About Power Dynamics Between Cofounders

When people talk about cofounders, the conversation usually centers on alignment. Shared vision. Complementary skills. Trust. Those things matter. But they are not the whole story. What rarely gets discussed is power. Not the obvious kind. The quiet kind. The kind that shows up in who speaks first, whose opinion carries weight without explanation, and who is expected to adapt when things feel misaligned. In the early days of a company, power can feel invisible. Everyone is moving fast. Decisions are made informally. Roles are fluid. What feels like flexibility at the start can slowly harden into something else. Power shows up in small ways. Who sets the agenda. Who frames problems. Who is seen as decisive versus emotional. Who gets the benefit of the doubt when something goes wrong. These dynamics are rarely intentional. Most cofounders are not trying to dominate or diminish one another. But intent does not erase impact. Over time, repeated patterns shape how safe it feels to speak, to...
Read more